I haven't seen the film Taking Woodstock yet, so I'm not sure if the character of Vilma, portrayed by actor Liev Schreiber, is a crossdresser or a transsexual woman. But I have my doubts that Vilma is a "cross dressing transsexual," as reported in a film review on News 8 Austin.I could be wrong. Perhaps she is MTF and dresses in men's clothing, which would then, I guess, make her a crossdressing transsexual. But I'll bet she doesn't.
Although there are some people who would beg to differ based on their own definitions, I consider myself a transsexual. I have been on testosterone for over 12 years and had chest reconstruction 11 years ago. All my paperwork says "M" (for male, not for miscreant). And, although I do not, if I occasionally or frequently put on a dress, a wig, and makeup, I would consider myself a crossdressing transsexual.
I do know some trans men who do drag, but that is not crossdressing. Drag is a performance art. It is entertainment for the stage. Crossdressing is not.
But my guess is that what makes Vilma a "cross dressing transsexual" in this film reviewer's eyes is that she is female and dresses as female ... umm, sort of like what most women do.
Otherwise, if she truly is a crossdresser, then she's not a transsexual. But now I'm so confused that I simply can't go on.
If reporters keep this up, I can have a whole blog of "what the heck is a" entries. Last week, we talked about "a transitioning," a mythical creature that frequents the restaurants in San Diego. Now we have a "cross dressing transsexual."
If anyone has seen Taking Woodstock, can you clear this up for me? Thanks much.
(Photo: Liev Schreiber as Vilma from the Focus Features Web site)
Read more...












